Making VCG More Robust in Combinatorial Auctions via Submodular Approximation
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) protocol is a theoretically well-founded protocol that can be used for combinatorial auctions. However, the VCG has several limitations such as (a) vulnerability to false-name bids, (b) vulnerability to loser collusion, and (c) the outcome is not in the core. Yokoo, Matsutani, & Iwasaki (2006) presented a new combinatorial auction protocol called the Groves Mechanism with SubModular Approximation (GM-SMA). This protocol satisfies the following characteristics: (1) it is false-name-proof, (2) each winner is included in a Pareto efficient allocation, and (3) as long as a Pareto efficient allocation is achieved, the protocol is robust against the collusion of losers and the outcome is in the core. The GM-SMA is the first protocol that satisfies all three of these characteristics. The basic ideas of the GM-SMA are as follows: (i) it is based on the VCG protocol, i.e., the payment of a winner in this protocol is identical to the payment in one instance of the Groves mechanism, which is a class of protocols that includes the VCG, (ii) when calculating the payment of a bidder, we approximate the valuations of other bidders by using a submodular valuation function (submodular approximation). This paper shows a high-level presentation of the GM-SMA protocol, and discusses open problems and the relationship to other works in AI.
منابع مشابه
Limits on Computationally Efficient VCG-Based Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions and Public Projects
A natural goal in designing mechanisms for auctions and public projects is to maximize the social welfare while incentivizing players to bid truthfully. If these are the only concerns, the problem is easily solved by use of the VCG mechanism. Unfortunately, this mechanism is not computationally efficient in general and there are currently no other general methods for designing truthful mechanis...
متن کاملA The Computational Complexity of Truthfulness in Combinatorial Auctions
Is it possible to design truthful polynomial-time mechanisms that achieve a good approximation ratio? This is one of the basic questions in Algorithmic Mechanism Design. The focus of most of the work on this question is on settings in which on one hand there exists a truthful algorithm that maximizes the social welfare (VCG), but on the other hand computing the optimal solution is computational...
متن کاملApproximations by Computationally-Efficient VCG-Based Mechanisms
We consider computationally-efficient incentive-compatible mechanisms that use the VCG payment scheme, and study how well they can approximate the social welfare in auction settings. We obtain a 2-approximation for multi-unit auctions, and show that this is best possible, even though from a purely computational perspective an FPTAS exists. For combinatorial auctions among submodular (or subaddi...
متن کاملThe Complexity and Algorithm for k-Duplicates Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular and Subadditive Bidders
In this paper, we study the problem of maximizing welfare in combinatorial auctions with k(> 1)duplicates of each item, where k is a fixed constant (i.e. k is not the part of the input) and bidders are submodular or subadditive. We exhibit some upper and lower approximation bounds for k-duplicates combinatorial auctions. First, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the maximum welfare for k...
متن کاملVC v. VCG: Inapproximability of Combinatorial Auctions via Generalizations of the VC Dimension
The existence of incentive-compatible computationally-efficient protocols for combinatorial auctions with decent approximation ratios is the paradigmatic problem in computational mechanism design. It is believed that in many cases good approximations for combinatorial auctions may be unattainable due to an inherent clash between truthfulness and computational efficiency. However, to date, resea...
متن کامل